Which is a valid Server-Side JavaScript block declaration?

Which is a valid Server-Side JavaScript block declaration?

• A. <script runat=server> [Insert JavaScript Here] </script>
• B. <script runat=server language="JavaScript" executioncontexttype="Post" executioncontextname="test"> [Insert JavaScript Here] </script>
• C. <script runat=server type="text/javascript"> [Insert JavaScript Here] </script>
• D. <ssjs> [Insert JavaScript Here] </ssjs>

Answer: (B)

Declaring a block of Server-Side JavaScript requires marking it as server-side and specifying the exact context in which it should run. The valid pattern uses a script tag with runat=server to designate server-side code, language="JavaScript" to indicate the language, and the executioncontexttype along with executioncontextname to define the specific context for execution. In this case, the context is a Post operation named test, which tells the engine how and where to execute the code. Providing just runat=server without language and context leaves the declaration incomplete for this environment. Using type="text/javascript" alone isn’t enough for a server-side block, and a nonstandard tag like <ssjs> isn’t recognized for this purpose.

Declaring a block of Server-Side JavaScript requires marking it as server-side and specifying the exact context in which it should run. The valid pattern uses a script tag with runat=server to designate server-side code, language="JavaScript" to indicate the language, and the executioncontexttype along with executioncontextname to define the specific context for execution. In this case, the context is a Post operation named test, which tells the engine how and where to execute the code.

Providing just runat=server without language and context leaves the declaration incomplete for this environment. Using type="text/javascript" alone isn’t enough for a server-side block, and a nonstandard tag like isn’t recognized for this purpose.